Manual recruitment vs. automated recruitment

Many companies still cling to the old ways of recruiting. The result is that they are relaxed about their competitors. Have you ever noticed that despite years of recruiting experience, you lag far behind in the success rate compared to newly emerging organizations? There are many companies that are springing up day by day and have better facilities. But what makes these companies different from you?

Well, the answer lies in the recruitment process itself. With new advances, the recruitment process has also been automated. Manual recruitment requires recruiters, which means a lot of money on the part of the company. The process spans a period of weeks or even months, meaning delayed placement of employees, and by the time candidates are shortlisted they would have joined another organization. Apart from the required period of time, there is no guarantee of the credibility of the work done.

Most of the time, due to the monotony of the job, recruiters tend to take their work as a burden and look at resumes, sometimes not even doing that, thus neglecting the potential candidates.

The ball is in your competitors’ hands as they don’t follow the traditional recruitment method but are equipped with an automated recruitment process, which means more efficiency. The automated software not only saves money, but also time and resources. The same number of resumes that used to take months to review are now analyzed in one night. The shortlisted candidates are the best and the industrialist can interview them in less time compared to manual recruitment. The companies will have the best employees with resume extraction software, making them peak.

BACA JUGA:  Why do we need computer training?

Get better employees in less time!

Total
0
Share